Rathke v. Gardner
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.
The statute provides that, “when the right to an easement or the title to real estate is in fact concerned in an action, and the judge before whom the action is tried certifies such to be the fact, the party finally prevailing therein shall recover his full costs, without regard to the amount of damages recovered.” St. 1862, a. 36, § 1. Pub. Sts. e. 198, § 6. Ordinarily, the certificate of the presiding justice, that the right to an easement or the title to real estate is, or is not, in fact concerned in the action, will be conclusive. But when the presiding justice bases his finding of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Curtis v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Bates v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bates v. Inhabitants of WestboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- O'Brien v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Hynes v. BrewerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Rychlicki v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Cassidy v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.