Legal Opinion

State v. Younge

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2013No. 20100146PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INTRODUCTION

Associate Chief Justice NEHRING,

opinion of the Court:

T1 Donald E. Younge Jr. contends that the State did not commence its prosecution of him within the statute of limitations. He also claims that his right to a speedy trial was violated. We hold that the State commenced Mr. Younge's prosecution within the applicable statute of limitations and that his right to a speedy trial was not violated and accordingly affirm his convictions.

BACKGROUND

{2 On the evening of November 7, 1996, twenty-three-year-old R.C. was walking home from the University of Utah when she was brutally attacked…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  2. State v. SamoraCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  3. Ronald Wayne Crebs III v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. GulleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. HintzeUtah Supreme Court · 2025

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API