State v. Younge
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
INTRODUCTION
Associate Chief Justice NEHRING,
opinion of the Court:
T1 Donald E. Younge Jr. contends that the State did not commence its prosecution of him within the statute of limitations. He also claims that his right to a speedy trial was violated. We hold that the State commenced Mr. Younge's prosecution within the applicable statute of limitations and that his right to a speedy trial was not violated and accordingly affirm his convictions.
BACKGROUND
{2 On the evening of November 7, 1996, twenty-three-year-old R.C. was walking home from the University of Utah when she was brutally attacked…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- State v. SamoraCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- Ronald Wayne Crebs III v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. GulleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. HintzeUtah Supreme Court · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.