Legal Opinion
Dunlap v. Sundberg
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1909No. 8151PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Neterer, J., entered February 8, 1909, upon sustaining demurrers to the complaint, dismissing an action for libel.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
Action for libel, commenced by Dr. John Dunlap, plaintiff, against John C. Sundberg and twenty-four other defendants. General demurrers interposed by the defendants were sustained; whereupon the plaintiff elected to stand upon his complaint, and has appealed from an order of dismissal.
This action involves the same petition which was published and of which complaint was made in Lathrop v. Sundberg, ante p. 144, 104 Pac. 176, reading as follows:
“We, the following reputable physicians and dentists, occupying offices in the Eitel Building, endeavoring to uphold the honor and dignity of our…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fleischmann v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Corr v. . Sun Printing Publishing Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Lathrop v. SundbergWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- De Witt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Fagan v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sims v. Kiro, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Marr v. PutnamOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Kosonen v. WaaraMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Velikanje v. MillichampWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Blaser v. KrattigerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.