Legal Opinion

Ex Parte White

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 21, 1981No. 80-689PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The duty is not on the defendant to request a court reporter. He is entitled to a court reporter but can waive the right.

By denying the writ, we are not to be understood as approving the statement by the Court of Criminal Appeals that "[n]o violation of the guaranty of due process results from the failure to provide a court reporter to preserve a record of testimony in the absence of a request therefore," for which proposition that court cited Aldridge v. State, 278 Ala. 470,179 So.2d 51 (1965).

WRIT DENIED.

MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aldridge v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Johnston v. City of IrondaleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Ex Parte MayeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Daniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Marquis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API