Ex Parte White
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The duty is not on the defendant to request a court reporter. He is entitled to a court reporter but can waive the right.
By denying the writ, we are not to be understood as approving the statement by the Court of Criminal Appeals that "[n]o violation of the guaranty of due process results from the failure to provide a court reporter to preserve a record of testimony in the absence of a request therefore," for which proposition that court cited Aldridge v. State, 278 Ala. 470,179 So.2d 51 (1965).
WRIT DENIED.
MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Aldridge v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
3Cited by13 opinions
- Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Johnston v. City of IrondaleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte MayeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Daniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Marquis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.