United States v. Parks
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
HOLSCHUH, District Judge.
This matter is currently before the Court on Defendant Jabrown Parks’ “motion to include an actus reus or criminal conduct requirement, a malice aforethought mens rea requirement, and a proximate cause requirement in the ‘kill’ element of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(e) 1 or, in the alternative, to declare § 2113(e) unconstitutional as applied to him” (Record at 44), and on Defendant’s related motion for a bill of particulars on Count 3 of the indictment (Record at 31, 32). 2 For the reasons stated below, the motion concerning § 2113(e) is granted in part and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. TollefsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- United States v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009