Legal Opinion

Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Louisville, N. A. & C. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided July 7, 1900Published

On Exceptions to the Report of the Master.

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

The mandate of the supreme court in this case was;

"To set aside the confirmation of sale. To inquire whether it is true, as alleged, that the foreclosure proceedings were made in pursuance of an agreement between the bondholder and stockholder to preserve the rigid s of both and destroy the interests of unsecured creditors, and that, if it shall appear that such was the agreement between these parties, to refuse to permit the confirmation of sale until the interests of unsecured creditors have been preserved, and to take such olher and further proceedings as shall be in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Wicker v. HoppockSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API