Legal Opinion

Marriage of Anderson v. Anderson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 29, 1983No. 82-1662PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORFINGER, Chief Judge.

The appellant contends on this appeal that a trial court has jurisdiction to consider a petition to modify and extend an award of rehabilitative alimony, although filed after the rehabilitative period has expired, but during the time the husband has not fulfilled his financial obligation under the original order and is in arrears in his payments. The trial court dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction. We reverse.

The final judgment dissolving the marriage of appellant-wife Jutta Anderson and appellee-husband William J. Anderson was entered November 7, 1980. It…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee v. LeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Pujals v. PujalsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Veach v. VeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Myrick v. MyrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Brown v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Altman v. AltmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Kirkland v. KirklandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Park Imaging, Inc. v. NMC Diagnostic Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API