Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Croft

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 15, 1834PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT. The plaintiff alleges, the defendant is indebted to him, in ■the sum of two thousand four hundred and fifty dollars, with interest thereon, at the rate of nine per cent, per annum, from the 20th day of April, 1826, until paid.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT. The plaintiff alleges, the defendant is indebted to him, in ■the sum of two thousand four hundred and fifty dollars, with interest thereon, at the rate of nine per cent, per annum, from the 20th day of April, 1826, until paid. He charges, that fhe defendant became so indebted, in pursuance of an agreement between them, to take up a note of one James A. Kirkland, which had been discounted in the branch bank of Louisiana, at St. Francisville, upon which four thousand, nine hundred. dollars was due, in which each of them were to pay one-half…

1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.

The plaintiff and appellant relies, for a reversal of the judgment of the District Court, on various grounds, which we proceed to notice in the order in which they are presented.

I. That the court refused to grant a new trial, which was asked on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

In his motion for a new trial, the plaintiff set forth, as one of the grounds, that he had discovered, since the trial, that the answers of Cash, Collins and Browden, and John *84Stirling, whose depositions were taken by the defendant in tqe cage 0f himself vs. Kirkland and Lee Hardesty, syndic, will prove and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brady v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Landry v. BaugnonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API