Webster v. City of Hastings
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from -the district court of Kearney county. Tried below before Beall, J. Heard on motion of defendant to quash -the summons in error.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
In an action grounded on negligence, brought by Jefferson H. Foxworthy against the city of Hastings, the defendant had judgment in its favor in the district court of Kearney county on May 20, 1897. In the following October, Foxworthy died intestate and Joseph E. Webster, the plaintiff in error, was appointed and has qualified as administrator of his estate. These facts are shown by the petition in error filed by Webster in this court on February 17, 1898. The defendant moves to quash the summons in error on the ground that the administrator cannot prosecute error in this court without having…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- International Bank v. JenkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Heirs of Hill v. Hill's ex'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
- Phares v. Saunders's Adm'rWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oatman v. HamptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Ritchey v. SeeleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- City of Charlottesville v. Stratton's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
- Ritchey v. SeeleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Ritchey v. SeeleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.