Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Miracle Ford, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 30, 1984No. 05-83-00806-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Justice.

James W. Hughes sued Miracle Ford, Inc. to recover a commission due on a finder’s fee contract, whereby Hughes agreed to procure a group of Mexican citizens to purchase automobile parts from Miracle Ford. After a jury trial in which the jury answered special issues favorably to Hughes, the trial court on motion of Miracle, rendered Judgment Non Obstante Ve-redicto. In five points of error, Hughes challenges the trial court’s judgment, contending that the evidence offered established his right of recovery, and that Miracle’s evidence failed to establish a defense. Miracle…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kinzbach Tool Co. v. Corbett-Wallace Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Groves v. HanksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Morris v. Jordan Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Kinzbach Tool Co. v. Corbett-Wallace Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Porter v. StrieglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robles v. Consolidated Graphics, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. Hoyt R. Matise Company v. Stanley ZurnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Garren v. First Realty, Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  4. Property House, Inc. v. KelleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. SimsTennessee Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API