Legal Opinion

Warnken & Co. v. Langdon Mercantile Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Cavalier County; Sauter, J. Action by T. J. Warnken and Bertha Warnken, co-partners as Warnken & Co., against Charles Chrisholm and Charles Hunter, co-partners as the Langdon Mercantile Company. Verdict for defendants. From an order refusing a new trial, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Plaintiff, as alleged owner, seeks to recover from defendants in conversion the value of certain personal property, which it is conceded was taken and sold by it under a certain chattel mortgage, but, as it claims, lawfully. At the close of plaintiffs’ case, upon defendant’s motion, a verdict was directed in its favor. Motion for a new trial was made, and overruled. Plaintiff appeals. The evidence shows that on December 15, 1894, the plaintiff, which does business at Morden, in the province of Manitoba, made a conditional sale of certain personal property, the value of which is involved in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vickery v. BurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Upton v. Sturbridge Cotton MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Pirie v. GillittNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. C. Aultman & Co. v. SilhaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. McRea v. Hillsboro National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Workmen's Compensation Fund v. Yellow Cab Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Taylor v. Minneapolis, Saint Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Stokes v. DaileyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Bidgood v. Monarch Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State Automobile and Casualty Underwriters v. SkjonsbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API