Legal Opinion

Wells v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1912No. 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

— Appellant was indicted, charged with embezzlement in an amount in excess of fifty dollars — a felony. When tried he was convicted of embezzlement of an amount less than fifty dollars — a misdemeanor.

After adjournment of court he attempts to perfect his appeal to this court by filing an appeal bond, not having entered into a recognizance during the term. Having been convicted of a misdemeanor only, the law does not authorize an appeal to be perfected by giving an appeal bond. (Art. 918, Code of Criminal Procedure; Herron v. State, 27 Texas, 337; Cook v. State, 8 Texas Crim.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herron v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Knowlton and Dominguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API