Territory v. Harris
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
REED, District Judge.
The constitutionality of the classification of salmon and salmon canneries contained in the amendatory act of 1923 has been decided adversely to the contention of the defendant by the Supreme Court of the United States and the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Pacific American Fisheries v. Territory of Alaska, and it need not be further mentioned; nor can it be seriously denied that the Legislature had authority to increase the excise tax or to declare an additional excise tax to that of 1921. See Patton v. Brady, 184 U. S. 608-619, 22 S. Ct. 493, 46 L.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patton v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Philadelphia Fire Assn. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gaar, Scott Co. v. ShannonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- State ex rel. Cream City Railway Co. v. HilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grau é Hijos v. PeopleSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1931
- M. Grau e Hijos v. PuebloSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1931