Legal Opinion

State v. Mansel

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 29, 1898PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Before Watts, J., Pickens, July, 1897. Indictment against Adam Mansel for taking orders for whiskey. From judgment against defendant, he appeals. (Arguments on point decided were oral.).

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted, at the July, 1897, term of the Court for Pickens County, for a violation of section 41 of the Dispen*469sary Act, approved in March, 1896 — 22 Stat., 147 — which is as follows: “Section 41. That it shall be unlawful for any person to take or to solicit orders, or to receive money from other persons for the purchase or shipment of any alcoholic liquors for or to such other persons in this State, except for liquors to be purchased and shipped from the dispensary; and any person violating this…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. In the Interest of Terrence M.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. GilliamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API