Atlantic Refining Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
The plaintiff is correct in its contention that the credit was allowed on October 30, 1923, Revolution Colton Mills v. United States, 41 F.(2d) 898, decided by this court June 16, 1930, but this does not entitle it to recover unless the Commissioner was wrong in his decision that plaintiff was liable for interest on the unpaid original tax for 1920 against which the credit was taken. We think the Commissioner correctly held that plaintiff was liable for interest under section 250(e) of the Revenue Act of 1918, 40 Stat. 1082, and section 250(e) of the Revenue Act of 1921, 42…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Realty Holding Co. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Nofire v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Rankin v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Gonzales v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005