Legal Opinion

Caulfield v. Noble

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 26, 1979Published

1Opinion of the Court

178 Conn. 81 (1979)

ROBERT L. CAULFIELD

v.

HENRY S. NOBLE ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Argued December 5, 1978.

Decision released June 26, 1979.

COTTER, C. J., LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI, LONGO and PETERS, JS.

Robert L. Caulfield, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

George C. Hastings, with whom, on the brief, was Ira Hicks, for the appellees (defendants).

LONGO, J.

The plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer of the town of New Canaan, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court denying his application for a writ of mandamus in which he sought, inter alia, to compel the defendant selectmen, tax collector…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API