Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Ross v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1951No. 32109, 32110PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

The defendants, the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company and Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad Company, filed objections in the county court of Carroll County to the application of the county collector for judgment for the sale of real estate for the nonpayment of taxes for the year 1948 levied by School District No., 71 for educational purposes. The board of education for the district was permitted to file an intervening petition. From judgments sustaining defendants objections, the intervenor has prosecuted two separate appeals. These appeals have been consolidated.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Ruchty v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People Ex Rel. Bailey v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Harding v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People ex rel. Ruchty v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API