Mard v. Weinstock
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Judge.
Michael J. Mard appeals a final order awarding him a fee for providing business valuations in a dissolution of marriage action. We reverse.
Attorneys for Ronda and Michael Wein-stock, parties to a dissolution of marriage proceeding, hired Mard to value the Wein-stocks’ respective medical practices. Mard sent a “representation and engagement letter” to Ronda Weinstock’s attorney charging a $3,000 retainer and stating that hourly fees would range from $45 to $135. Mard never received a signed acceptance and did not submit a similar engagement letter to Michael Weinstock’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fischer v. KnuckSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Powell v. BarnesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Young v. YoungDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Bystrom v. Florida Rock IndustriesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Dream Inn, Inc. v. HesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berry v. BerryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Curran v. CurranDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000