Legal Opinion

Broussard v. Guidry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1985No. 84-68PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Judge.

The sole issue presented for review is whether the plaintiff alleges a cause of action in his petition for the partition of an entire 31.46 arpent tract of land in St. Martin Parish.

The plaintiff, A. Claude Broussard, brought this suit against Ophe Guidry and his wife, Berthe Duplechien Guidry, Dr. G.W. Martin and his wife, Cecilia Guilbeau, and the heirs of Numa Journet, to force a judicial partition of an entire 31.46 arpent tract. Defendants, Ophe Guidry and Berthe Duplechien, filed exceptions of no right of action and no cause of action. Without assigning written reasons, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Delta Bank & Trust Co. v. LassiterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  3. Federal Land Bank v. MulhernSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  4. Breaux v. LairdSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  5. Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. PerezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Broussard v. GuidryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API