Howard v. Citizens & Southern Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. The petition contained several counts. A general demurrer to the first count was overruled, and to this judgment no exceptions were taken. This ruling, therefore, “made the law of the case, and was a conclusive determination that a right of action existed in favor of 'the plaintiff.” The case proceeded to trial, and the undisputed evidence introduced clearly established the plaintiff’s case as laid in the first count of her petition. The plaintiff,^ therefore, was entitled to a verdict and judgment in her favor for the amount sued for in the first count of her petition (Pierpont Mfg. Co.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pierpont Mfg. Co. v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peek v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Hall v. Massachusetts Protective Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Citizens & Southern Bank v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925