Legal Opinion
Elio v. Akron Transportation Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1947No. 30750PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
A court speaks only'through its journal. Therefore, when a court’s opinion and journal are in conflict the latter controls. Will v. McCoy, 135 Ohio St., 241, 20 N. E. (2d), 371. See, also, Squire, Supt. of Banks, v. Guardian Trust Co., 144 Ohio St., 266, 58 N. E. (2d), 651.
In the opinion of the Court of Appeals it is stated that the interrogatories of the plaintiff were improperly submitted. However, the journal entry of the Court of Appeals limits its reversal as follows:
“The court erred in refusing to require the jury to properly answer interrogatories 2 and 3 submitted by the appellant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davison v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Clark v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Jewell v. Chicago, St. Paul & Minneapolis Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Mason Tire & Rubber Co. v. LansingerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- Will v. McCoyOhio Supreme Court · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Ragone v. Vitali & Beltrami, Jr., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Bradley v. Mansfield Rapid Transit, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
- Klever v. Reid Bros. Express, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- Di v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.