Legal Opinion

Burroughs v. JACKSON NAT. INS. CO.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1993No. 1911250PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burroughs sued Jackson National Life Insurance Company and its agent, Robert O. Curtis, alleging fraudulent misrepresentation regarding a Jackson National product known as "Enhanced Ultimate," which Burroughs claims he was induced to purchase. Burroughs appeals from a summary judgment for Jackson National and Curtis.

Burroughs alleged that Curtis, an agent of Jackson National, told him that "he could 'get his money out' when he wanted to, though the policy had no cash value for the first two years." He testified in his deposition that he thought the "Enhanced Ultimate" product sounded "too…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Fincher v. Robinson Bros. Lincoln-MercurySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Specialty Container Manufacturing, Inc. v. Rusken Packaging, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Nolen v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. ASTRAZENECA LP v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. KirtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Sandoz, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API