Legal Opinion

Mosely v. Echols

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1991No. 90-1246PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant argues that after the direct appeal of his convictions was affirmed, the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County ruled that theft and theft in office were allied offenses of similar import in State v. McGhee (1987), 37 Ohio App.3d 54, 523 N.E.2d 864, and State v. Tatum (May 21, 1987), No. 52137, unreported, 1987 WL 11396, and that this ruling should be applied retroactively to his case to eliminate six years of his prison term and cause his immediate release.

Appellant has no cause of action in habeas corpus because even if accepted, the issue he raises would not deprive the sentencing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burch v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. McGheeOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Williams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Smith v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Jackson v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. LeeOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API