Rebound, Inc. v. Pugh
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SPINDEN, Judge.
Neither party is satisfied with the probate court’s decision concerning claims by Rebound, Inc.,1 against the estate of Barbara Bonner for medical services to Bonner and her infant son, Jeremy. The probate court cut Rebound’s claim for services to Bonner by about 42 percent and denied all of its claim for services to Jeremy. As to the claim for services to Bonner, we remand with instructions that the probate court clarify which of Bonner’s expenses it deemed unreasonable or medically unnecessary. As to the claim for services to Jeremy, we reverse and remand with instructions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ronollo v. JacobsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Estate of Ewing v. BryanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hulse v. WarrenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Green v. HastingsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Medical Services Ass'n v. PerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of BonnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Response Oncology, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Rebound, Inc. v. PughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997