Legal Opinion

Broom v. Helms

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 27, 1909No. 7292PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Hydrick, J., Lancaster, October, 1908. Action by Elizabeth Broom et al. against Dock F. Helms. From order of nonsuit, plaintiffs appeal. No citations on point decided. No citations on point decided.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chi®? Justice Jones.

This is an appeal from an order of nonsuit in an action for partition of real estate, wherein an issue of title was raised by defendant’s answer, and the trial was had before a jury.

This being an action in equity, the authorities in this State are numerous to the effect that nonsuit is improper. Woolfolk v. Manf'g Co., 22 S. C., 332; McClenaghan v. McEachern, 47 S. C., 446, 25 S. E., 296; Barnes v. Rodgers, 54 S. C., 115, 31 S. E., 885; Gilreath v. Furman, 57 S. C., 289, 35 S. E., 516; Railway v. Beaudrot, 63 S. C., 266, 41 S.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. v. BeaudrotSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  2. Barnes v. RodgersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  3. Gilreath v. FurmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  4. McClenaghan v. McEachernSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. BoddieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API