Legal Opinion

Kowal v. State

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 21, 1956No. 1103 and 1104, Civil Action, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, J.:

By their allegations of diminution, plaintiffs seek to have this Court direct the Court below to incorporate in its record and return the transcript of evidence taken at the trial. Although in this State the Courts of Common Pleas have no official reporter, it appears that the evidence in these cases was taken at the request of the plaintiffs by a qualified reporter, who supplied a transcript to the trial Judge. Plaintiffs contend that the Court below misconstrued a criminal statute in such way as to render it unconstitutional; that plaintiffs were prejudiced thereby; that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Douglass and Others v. Reynolds and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Knight v. HaleySuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1928
  4. Mayor, &C. of New Orleans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maddrey v. Justice of the Peace Court 13Supreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. Du Pont v. Family Court for New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
  3. Hopkins v. Justice of Peace Court No. 1Superior Court of Delaware · 1975
  4. Rodenhiser v. Department of Public SafetySuperior Court of Delaware · 1957
  5. Cooch's Bridge Civic Ass'n v. Pencader Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API