Legal Opinion

Cathey v. Buchanan Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1909PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Ward, J., August Term, 1909, of Graham. Civil action, to recover land and damages. These issues were submitted: 1. “Are tbe plaintiffs tbe owners in fee of tbe lands described in tbe complaint ?” Answer: “Yes; one-tbird interest.” 2. “Have tbe defendants cut and removed timber therefrom, as alleged?” Answer: “Yes.” 3. “What damage has been done to said land by reason of cutting and removing said timber?” Answer: “$1,033.50.” The case was made to turn upon tbe…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Ward, J., August Term, 1909, of Graham. Civil action, to recover land and damages. These issues were submitted: 1. “Are tbe plaintiffs tbe owners in fee of tbe lands described in tbe complaint ?” Answer: “Yes; one-tbird interest.” 2. “Have tbe defendants cut and removed timber therefrom, as alleged?” Answer: “Yes.” 3. “What damage has been done to said land by reason of cutting and removing said timber?” Answer: “$1,033.50.” The case was made to turn upon tbe construction of a deed from A. W. Crisp and others to John M. King, dated 8 November, 1888, which is as follows: “State oe…

1Opinion of the Court

Bkoww, J.,

after stating the case: The only controversy presented for our decision by the assignments of error arises upon the ruling of the court below, that the description’ of the land attempted to be conveyed by deed from 0. Randolph et als. to John M. King, upon which the defendant relies to prove title, is insufficient and so indefinite as not to permit the introduction of parol evidence to locate the land.

We have considered with care the very full and well-prepared brief of the learned counsel for appellants, and are nevertheless of opinion that the deed is void for uncertainty in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dickens v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. Harrell v. . ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Murdock v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1858
  4. Harris v. Woodard.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Allen v. . ChambersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1845

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Builders Supplies Co. of Goldsboro, NC, Inc. v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Hodges v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Katz v. . DaughtreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API