Seay v. State

Graves, Judge.

Appellants were convicted of the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area, and each fined $100.00.

In their brief appellants offer two assignments upon which to predicate a reversal of this case, both of which seem to us to be well taken.

Their first assignment complains of the introduction in evidence, and the reading to the jury of the affidavit upon which the search warrant is based, and the warrant itself. That such affidavit and warrant contained damaging statements, going to show that the affiants claimed to know of their own personal knowledge…