Legal Opinion

Tunnicliffe v. Bay Cities Consolidated Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Bay; Maxwell, J. Case by Louise M. Tunnicliffe, an infant, by her next friend, William H. Tunnicliffe, against the Bay Cities Consolidated Railway Company, for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

This cause is here upon a second appeal, and a statement of the case will be found in 102 Mich. 624.

Upon a second trial the counsel for the defendant filed a challenge to the array. The printed record contains a copy of this paper, within which is what purports to be a copy of an order setting aside the returns of jury lists for the year 1894, and ordering that the supervisors and *263town clerks of the various townships, and the supervisors and aldermen of the various wards of the cities in Bay county, make and return new lists, etc. The challenge states that this order was made on November 24,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tunnicliffe v. Bay Cities Consolidated Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prescott v. RobinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  2. Hillman v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Finer v. NicholsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Washington & O. D. Ry. Co. v. DulanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. Rollo v. City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API