Legal Opinion

Samuel C. Dysart and Alma R. Dysart v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 22, 1965No. 61-63Published

1Opinion of the Court

340 F.2d 624

Samuel C. DYSART and Alma R. Dysart

v.

The UNITED STATES.

No. 61-63.

United States Court of Claims.

January 22, 1965.

Charles R. Cutler, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff. Kirkland, Ellis, Hodson, Chaffetz & Masters, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Mitchell Samuelson, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen., Louis F. Oberdorfer, for defendant. C. Moxley Featherston, Lyle M. Turner, and Philip R. Miller, Washington, D. C., were on the brief.

Before COWEN, Chief Judge, and LARAMORE, DURFEE, DAVIS, and COLLINS, Judges.

LARAMORE, Judge.

1

This is a suit for the refund of $4,548.48…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API