Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Greenlee

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 1996No. 20759PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Judge.

James E. Greenlee and Carol J. Greenlee (defendants) appeal a judgment entered against them in an action Dale Nixon and Dorothy Nixon (plaintiffs) brought for fraudulent misrepresentation. Plaintiffs’ misrepresentation claim was Count II of a three-count petition. Count I was an action for breach of contract. Count III sought punitive damages based on the action for fraudulent misrepresentation. The trial court dismissed Count I at the close of all the evidence and found in favor of defendants on Count III. This court reverses and remands with directions with respect to Count…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of LaffertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Thoroughbred Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Yerington v. RissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Cave v. CaveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Rogers v. HickersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vintila v. DrassenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Coale v. HillesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Baiwir v. MoodyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. L.M. v. C.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API