William Rogers Manufacturing Co. v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Petition por an attachment for contempt for violation of a temporary injunction against the use of certain trade marks and a trade name.
Read the full summary
Petition por an attachment for contempt for violation of a temporary injunction against the use of certain trade marks and a trade name. The Superior Court found the respondents guilty of the alleged contempt, and reserved the following questions for the advice of this court, viz: ' 1. What amount of fine or imprisonment, or what other punishment, it is within the discretionary power of the Superior Court, or of the judge of said court before whom the proceedings in relation to the attachment have been heard, to inflict, and whether, if a fine is imposed, it may legally be divided and…
1Opinion of the CourtSeymour, J.
In this case a temporary injunction was issued restraining the respondents from the use of certain trade marks, and from the use of a certain trade name. Other acts were also enjoined against, hut it is not necessary to state more at length the character of the injunction. On the 19th of July, 1870, the petitioners filed their petition for an attachment against the respondents for contempt. The petition alleges several gross violations of the injunction, and on a hearing before the Superior Court the allegations of the bill are found true, and it is also found that the respondents have not in…
2Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Stoner v. StonerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.