Senn v. Senn
Superior Court of Delaware
Petition by the Attorney General for rule to show cause (No. 41, May Term, 1914) why the decree nisi granted in the action for divorce (No. 41, May Term, 1914), in New Castle County, by Mary K. Senn v. Lewis Senn should not be vacated, it being alleged in the petition that Mary K. Senn had, under another name, within a year from the entry of the decree nisi, married another, contrary to the act of assembly. The rule coming on to be heard, the court vacated the decree.
1Opinion of the Court
Heisel, J.,
delivering the opinion of the court:
On December 14, 1914, Josiah 0. Wolcott, Attorney General of this state, filed his petition alleging that Mary IC. Senn filed a petition in this court on April 10, 1914, praying for divorce from her husband, Lewis Senn; that at the May Term, 1914, a decree nisi was granted by this court to the said Mary K. Senn; that on the thirtieth day of May, A. D. 1914, the said Mary K. Senn, under the name of Mary C. Lewis, was married to one Harry H. Wurtle, at the Town of Elkton, in the State of Maryland; and prayed that a rule issue directed to .the said…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Street v. StreetSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953
- Wavrinevich v. WavrinevichSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961