Legal Opinion

Batchie v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

A notice pursuant to CPLR 3111 to produce materials at an examination before trial need not contain the specificity of identity required for the discovery and inspection of materials sought pursuant to CPLR 3120 (see, Weiss v Rae, 87 AD2d 629; Melnick v Melnick, 85 AD2d 531; Orange & Rockland Utilities v Town of Clarkstown, 64 AD2d 919). “All that is required is a description which is as detailed as is reasonable to expect under the circumstances” (supra, p 920; Melnick v Melnick, supra). Special Term properly found here that plaintiffs’ “Supplemental Notice to Produce” was sufficient to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. Town of ClarkstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Melnick v. MelnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Weiss v. RaeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API