Legal Opinion

Palisades Collections, L.L.C. v. Grieshop, 2-07-13 (10-29-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 2007No. 2-07-13PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Francis E. Grieshop (hereinafter "Grieshop"), pro se, appeals the judgment of the Auglaize County Court of Common Pleas denying his "motion to vacate a void judgment."1 For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

{¶ 2} On June 16, 2006, Palisades Collections, LLC (hereinafter "Palisades") filed a complaint in the trial court alleging that it had acquired title and interest in claims against Grieshop in the amount of $27, 536.06.

{¶ 3} On August 14, 2006, Palisades filed a motion for default judgment. In its August 17, 2006 judgment entry, the trial court found that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Buckeye Supply Co. v. Northeast Drilling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Logsdon v. Ohio Northern UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Countrymark Cooperative, Inc. v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Barrett, 08 Ma 130 (12-12-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. In re BallOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API