Legal Opinion

Engel v. Daniels

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 27, 2006No. 06-413 HAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAGGERTY, Chief Judge.

On March 23, 2006, petitioner filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [2] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner alleges that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has refused to process his request to be placed in the Drug and Alcohol Treatment Program (DAP), thereby violating his constitutional rights.

Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petition [8], alleging that petitioner has no cognizable claim because he does not allege a violation of his constitutional or statutory rights relating to the length, nature, and condition of his confinement. For the following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cort v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Hicks v. HoodDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
  3. Wade v. DanielsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API