Legal Opinion

In Re the Will of Sessoms

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 12, 1961No. 172PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Caveators have no assignments of error as to the evidence. They have three assignments of error, other than two formal ones, and all three are to the charge of the court to the jury.

Propounder’s evidence tends to show the following facts: A. (Alfred) T. Sessoms was a business man engaged in various activities, farming, sale of gasoline, operation of a cafe and a store, and had a franchise for Linen White bleach covering three states. He did business and made deposits in the The Scottish Bank in Salemburg. A. T. Sessoms was twice married. Caveators are children of his first marriage. A. T.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. In Re Will of HedgepethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. In re the Will of MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. In Re Will of RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. In Re the Will of WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Gas Corporation v. CarnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Johnson v. Aetna Finance, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Matter of Will of LeonardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. General Gas Corporation v. CarnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. In re the Will of WestonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API