Legal Opinion · Dissent

C.S. v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 30, 2013No. Nos. 4D13-713, 4D13-714, 4D13-774Published

1DissentWarner, J.

I dissent. I would adopt the reasoning of O.R. v. Department of Children and Family Services, 979 So.2d 1105, 1106-1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), which interpreted identical language in the dependency statute regarding the trial court’s authority to enter a consent. The Third District held that the similar dependency statute, section 39.506(3), Florida Statutes (2008), does not authorize the trial court to enter a consent when the parents appear for the first day of trial but are not present on a continuation of the trial.

Section 39.801(3)(d), Florida Statutes (2012), provides:

If a parent appears…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Padgett v. Dept. of Health & Rehab. ServicesSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Nl v. Dept. of Children and Family Ser.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. R.W.W. v. State, Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. MH v. Department of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Gaines v. Dept. of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API