Legal Opinion

Shary v. Helmick

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 1935No. 9586Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellees, in their motion for a rehearing, contend that as appellants did not object and except to the submission of issue-No. 6 to the jury, on the ground that it was not supported by the pleadings and the evidence, they should not now be heard to raise this matter after the jury have-decided the issue against them.

We do not agree with this contention. It has been definitely held by the Supreme Court, speaking through the Commission of Appeals, that it is fundamental error of the trial court to submit an issue to the jury which has not been plead. Dominguez v. Garcia…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Edward Thompson Co. v. SawyersTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Pittman v. Bloch Queensware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. United States Gypsum Co. v. ShieldsTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Bankers' Trust Co. v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API