State v. Martin (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
*514 {¶ 1} This appeal concerns a juvenile court's duty to consider the applicability of R.C. 2152.021 -Ohio's "safe harbor" law-which benefits certain human-trafficking victims charged with juvenile delinquency. R.C. 2152.021(F)(3) requires the court to appoint a guardian ad litem when a juvenile is a human-trafficking victim and is charged with an offense that is "related to" the victimization. Appellant, Alexis Martin, asks this court to hold that the juvenile court's failure to consider and apply R.C. 2152.021(F)(3) invalidated its discretionary transfer of her case to adult court.
{¶ 2} We…
Also in this document: Dissent · O'Donnell; Dissent · O'Donnell.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. KeithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smith v. May (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- In re R.B. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. FuellOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- In re K.K.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. E.T.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.