Risken v. Clayman
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McGIVERIN, Justice.
The ultimate question in this declaratory judgment action is who, as between a contract vendor and an assignee of the vendee, is entitled to the insurance proceeds from a fire loss that preceded forfeiture of the real estate contract. On this record, we conclude the latter should prevail.
Plaintiff Louis Risken, assignee of the vendee, appealed from a district court ruling that the issue in the present action had been decided in a prior case, barring this action under the doctrine of res judicata, and ordering Risken to tender the insurance proceeds to defendants Abe Clayman…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hunter v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Israel v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Abodeely v. CavrasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Kintzel v. Wheatland Mutual Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Farmers Savings Bank, Joice v. GerhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Buckingham v. Federal Land Bank Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Farmers & Merchants Savings Bank v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- McBride v. HammersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Jordan v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991