Legal Opinion

Risken v. Clayman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 14, 1987No. 85-541PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Justice.

The ultimate question in this declaratory judgment action is who, as between a contract vendor and an assignee of the vendee, is entitled to the insurance proceeds from a fire loss that preceded forfeiture of the real estate contract. On this record, we conclude the latter should prevail.

Plaintiff Louis Risken, assignee of the vendee, appealed from a district court ruling that the issue in the present action had been decided in a prior case, barring this action under the doctrine of res judicata, and ordering Risken to tender the insurance proceeds to defendants Abe Clayman…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Israel v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Abodeely v. CavrasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Kintzel v. Wheatland Mutual Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Farmers Savings Bank, Joice v. GerhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buckingham v. Federal Land Bank Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  2. Farmers & Merchants Savings Bank v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. McBride v. HammersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. Jordan v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API