Treadway v. Diez
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentJackson, Judge
Because I believe the trial court erred in denying defendant Sheriff’s Department’s motions to dismiss and allowing plaintiffs’ motions to amend, I respectfully dissent.
In the cases sub judice, plaintiffs’ respective complaints and amended complaints named as a party-defendant, “Buncombe County Sheriff’s Department.” A series of summonses and alias and pluries summonses each named “Buncombe County Sheriff’s Department” as a party-defendant. The Sheriff’s Department moved to dismiss because “Buncombe County Sheriff’s Department is not a legal entity subject to suit[.]” Pursuant to North…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Summey v. BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Clark v. Burke CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Boyd v. Robeson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Crossman v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- Summey v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.