Legal Opinion · Dissent

Treadway v. Diez

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 2011No. COA10-99, COA10-100Published

1DissentJackson, Judge

Because I believe the trial court erred in denying defendant Sheriff’s Department’s motions to dismiss and allowing plaintiffs’ motions to amend, I respectfully dissent.

In the cases sub judice, plaintiffs’ respective complaints and amended complaints named as a party-defendant, “Buncombe County Sheriff’s Department.” A series of summonses and alias and pluries summonses each named “Buncombe County Sheriff’s Department” as a party-defendant. The Sheriff’s Department moved to dismiss because “Buncombe County Sheriff’s Department is not a legal entity subject to suit[.]” Pursuant to North…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Summey v. BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Clark v. Burke CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Boyd v. Robeson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Crossman v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Summey v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API