Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bristow

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1988No. 1349PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered after a jury found appellant guilty of rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, statutory rape, corruption of a minor, incest, indecent assault, indecent exposure, and simple assault. Appellant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by: (1) failing to seek recusal of the trial judge since the trial judge had presided over appellant’s preliminary hearing in this matter; (2) failing to properly preserve for appellate review the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Rosche v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GogginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. PankrazSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. TavaresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. LottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API