Legal Opinion

Fleischmann v. Schuckmann

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action for j a perpetual injunction restraining the use by defendant of a trade-mark.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

— This is an action brought by the plaintiff to restrain the¡ use of his trade-mark by the defendant. The plaintiff is a ^manufacturer in the city of blew York of an article known as “ Vienna bread,” and which he has for many years past sold with a label thereon containing these words: “ Fleischmann* Vienna Model Bakery, Broadway and Tenth street, blew Yi>rk. Patent applied for.” Since the plaintiff introduced his article, and after it had gone into general use, *93the defendant commenced to manufacture and has continued to sell bread in loaves of a form similar to those of plaintiff, with a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Julius Kayser & Co. v. Italian Silk Underwear Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. W. A. Gaines & Co. v. LeslieNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Shaw Stocking Co. v. MackU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1882
  4. Clinton Metalic Paint Co. v. New York Metalic Paint Co.New York Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Smiling Irishman, Inc. v. McDonaldNew York Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API