People ex rel. Gordon v. Heath
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Generally, “[a] writ of habeas corpus may not be used for review of issues that have been, or could have been, reviewed on direct appeal or by a postjudgment motion addressed to the court in which an underlying judgment of conviction was rendered” (People ex rel. Dushain v Ercole, 64 AD3d 669, 669 [2009]; see People ex rel. Keitt v McMann, 18 NY2d 257, 263 [1966]; People ex rel. Bazil v Marshall, 77 AD3d 982, 982 [2010] ). However, “cases may arise where the right to invoke habeas corpus may take precedence over ‘procedural orderliness and conformity’ ” (People ex rel. Keitt v McMann, 18 NY2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People ex rel. Keitt v. McMannNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. SchildhausNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- People ex rel. Pearson v. GarvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People ex rel. Dushain v. ErcoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People ex rel. Kuby v. WardenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.