Legal Opinion

United States v. Randall Gene Cunningham

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1990No. 88-3046PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter returns to us following an order from the United States Supreme Court. See United States v. Cunningham, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2580, 110 L.Ed.2d 261 (1990). The Court vacated our prior opinion, United States v. Cunningham, 878 F.2d 311 (9th Cir.1989), and remanded for our further consideration in light of Taylor v. United States, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). In our prior opinion we reversed the district court’s imposition of an enhanced criminal sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924 (1988). Cunningham, 878 F.2d at 312. In light of Taylor,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Gregory Lee ChatmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Randall Gene CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Darrel Duane GriselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Lesester D. McDougherty AKA Lester JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Jeffrey Dean BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Michael Eugene HarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. BermudezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API