Legal Opinion
Hock v. Builtland Partners
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 5, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*1033OPINION OF THE COURT
Lorraine S. Miller, J.
Plaintiffs, Louis and Janice Hock, move for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendants’ liability, pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1). That motion is granted.
Plaintiff, Louis Hock, was employed for 30 years by third-party defendant, Ogden Allied Services, as a window cleaner. On August 28, 1989 he was directed to go to the seventh floor of 335 Madison Avenue in New York City (owned by defendant, Builtland Partners, and managed by defendant, Cushman and Wakefield, Inc.) to help with the scaffold and rigging being used on the outside of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hock v. Builtland PartnersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996