Legal Opinion

Rollison v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1993No. E-93-37Published

1Per curiam

This matter is before the court on relator Timothy L. Rollison’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Relator contends his right to a speedy trial has been violated.

The Ohio Supreme Court has held that an appeal rather than a writ of habeas corpus is the proper remedy to challenge alleged violations of the right to a speedy trial. In re Singer (1976), 45 Ohio St.2d 130, 74 O.O.2d 253, 341 N.E.2d 849, In re Jackson (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 189, 522 N.E.2d 540. As we are bound by these Supreme Court rulings, the relief demanded by petitioner is hereby denied. However, we invite the Ohio Supreme…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re SingerOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In re JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API