Legal Opinion

Toroian v. Parkview Amusement Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 14, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff appeals from a verdict and judgment in favor of defendants rendered in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in an action for damages for personal injuries. The amount sued for gives this court jurisdiction of the appeal.

The injuries alleged are charged to have been suffered while she was riding an amusement device known as "Hey-Day," she having paid the regular fare for the ride. The hey-day is described in appellant's second amended petition as a device consisting of "a circular platform approximately thirty to forty feet in diameter upon which were a number of two-passenger…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bond v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  2. Pointer v. Mountain Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  3. Mirrielees v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Dietzman v. St. Louis Screw Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. Chinn v. NaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. PitcairnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Atlanta Funtown, Inc. v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Page v. City of FayetteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Myers v. Kansas City Junior Orpheum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Emory v. St. James Distillery, Inc., 143 mo.app. 318 (mo.app. 9-18-1940)Missouri Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API