Legal Opinion

Karp v. Karp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 27, 1958Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover a fund on deposit in respondent bank in a joint account *1056in the names of appellant and the individual respondent, his son, and for other relief, the appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113). Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. The record shows that in 1952 appellant opened an account with respondent bank in his own name and that the entire fund in question was accumulated by him in the ensuing years. The record further shows that in November, 1957 he had the account changed to be payable to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. In Re the Accounting of Van AlstyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Katzman v. Ætna Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Stevens v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  5. In re the Estate of DalyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API